TTriveniExecutive Cockpit

Order Book / Pipeline 360

The front of the order book — tender & order pipeline by stage (gears, water, ethanol allocations), forecast vs plan, win/loss, and the deals that decide the quarter.

Triveni Engineering & Industries Limited · FY24 (Mar'24, audited anchor)
One of India's largest integrated sugar & ethanol producers
5,500 employees · 13+ plants & units · 15 export markets
Executive read· the answer, then the moves

Q3 FY26 commit ₹1,400 Cr sits ₹200 Cr below the ₹1,600 Cr plan — ₹350 Cr of best-case upside must convert to make the number. Coverage is 2x on ₹3,200 Cr of pipeline; the call is winnable but only if the at-risk upside is forced to close.

3 of 3 headline metrics improving vs prior · still off target: Contracted Offtake & Order Intake ₹6,400 Cr vs ₹6,600 Cr, Confirmed Order Book ₹1,750 Cr vs ₹1,900 Cr

Do now — ranked by urgency
  1. 1
    Convert ₹350 Cr of best-case upside to close the ₹200 Cr plan gapAct now
    Why it matters

    Commit ₹1,400 Cr is ₹200 Cr short of the ₹1,600 Cr Q3 FY26 plan — the gap that decides whether the quarter lands.

    What's driving it
    • Q3 FY26 commit ₹1,400 Cr vs ₹1,600 Cr plan
    • ₹350 Cr best-case upside above commit
    FYI
    • Pipeline ₹3,200 Cr (2x coverage), ₹1,360 Cr weighted
    • Owner: CRO
  2. 2
    ₹80 Cr of programs at risk — Q4 FY26Act now
    Why it matters

    Each lost contract is ethanol & engineering (non-sugar) revenue that won't repeat.

    What's driving it
    • renewal window Q4 FY26
    • Signal: Order-book risk
    FYI
    • Of ₹520 Cr of programs up for renewal in Q4 FY26, ₹80 Cr is at risk of non-repeat.
    • Owner: Chief Marketing & Sales Officer
  3. 3
    ₹90 Cr of programs at risk — Q2 FY27Act now
    Why it matters

    Each lost contract is ethanol & engineering (non-sugar) revenue that won't repeat.

    What's driving it
    • renewal window Q2 FY27
    • Signal: Order-book risk
    FYI
    • Of ₹500 Cr of programs up for renewal in Q2 FY27, ₹90 Cr is at risk of non-repeat.
    • Owner: Chief Marketing & Sales Officer
  4. 4
    Attack the top loss reason: Sugar export policy / price competitiveness (₹260 Cr lost)Watch
    Why it matters

    ₹-win-rate is 70% (₹1,300 Cr won vs ₹560 Cr lost); Sugar export policy / price competitiveness is the single largest leak at ₹260 Cr.

    What's driving it
    • ₹-win-rate 70%
    • Top loss Sugar export policy / price competitiveness ₹260 Cr across 42 deals
    FYI
    • Top win driver: Integrated cane-to-ethanol capability ₹620 Cr
    • Tighten discount discipline via Order & Tender 360
📈 Offtake, orders & exportsStep 1 of 6 · order book, OMC tenders & forecastCustomer 360All journeys
🌐 Enterprise 360 modules· on Order-Book / Sales 360Browse all 31 views ▾
● LiveBuilt forCMO / Sales VPs· coverage & forecast callSales Ops· stage velocity & hygieneCEO / Board· will we make the quarter

Triveni is pursuing ₹3,200 Cr of order pipeline across the funnel (₹1,360 Cr weighted). This view answers the sales chief's two questions — will we make the quarter (forecast vs plan) and why we win or lose — and points at the deals that move the number.

Data backing: pipeline_stage · forecast · winloss · opportunity · kpi
₹3,200 Cr
Qualified pipeline
299 opps
₹1,360 Cr
Weighted pipeline
value × win-prob
70%
₹-Win-rate
won ÷ (won+lost) ₹
₹6,400 Cr
Bookings
book-to-bill 1.04x
₹1,750 Cr
Backlog
signed, not delivered
Coverage

Pipeline by stage

Value and win-probability rise toward the close — weighted value is what to bank on.

Qualify · 130 opps · 20% win₹1,150 Cr
Develop · 90 opps · 40% win₹900 Cr
Proposal · 55 opps · 60% win₹750 Cr
Negotiation · 24 opps · 80% win₹400 Cr

Dark fill = win-probability within each stage's value. Weighted pipeline totals ₹1,360 Cr.

The forecast call

Q3 FY26 — ₹1,400 Cr commit vs ₹1,600 Cr plan

Commit, best-case and closed-to-date against the plan line.

Q1 FY26 · actualclosed ₹1,470 Cr vs plan ₹1,450 Cr
Q2 FY26 · actualclosed ₹1,460 Cr vs plan ₹1,480 Cr
Q3 FY26 · currentcommit ₹1,400 Cr · best ₹1,750 Cr
Q4 FY26 · forecastcommit ₹1,150 Cr · best ₹1,820 Cr

Q3 FY26: commit ₹1,400 Cr is ₹200 Cr below the ₹1,600 Cr plan; ₹350 Cr of best-case upside must convert to close the gap. Black line = plan.

Why we win & lose

₹-win-rate 70% · ₹1,300 Cr won vs ₹560 Cr lost

Clone the win reasons into low-win families; attack the top loss reason first.

Why we win
Integrated cane-to-ethanol capability₹620 Cr · 88
Long-term OMC ethanol offtake₹420 Cr · 40
Turbo-gear engineering & defence qualification₹260 Cr · 34
Why we lose
Sugar export policy / price competitiveness₹260 Cr · 42
Cane cost / recovery competitiveness₹180 Cr · 26
Water-tender pricing₹120 Cr · 18

Read it: integrated cane-to-ethanol capability wins the most (₹620 Cr); Sugar export policy / price competitiveness is the top loss (₹260 Cr) — tighten discount discipline (see Order & Tender 360) before chasing new demand.

Move the number

Named deals in play

Signal-sourced deals convert higher — prioritize them.

OpportunityCustomerSolutionValueStageWin %Source
E25 blending — incremental OMC ethanol tenderBPCLEthanol / EBP supply₹300 CrDevelop55%signal
Sabitgarh distillery expansion (860→1,110 KLPD)IOCL (Indian Oil)Alcohol / Distillery (Ethanol)₹250 CrProposal62%signal
Sugar export quota (policy-linked)Sugar traders & exportersSugar trade & exports₹200 CrQualify40%signal
Turbo-gear order — power / cement / steelSteel majors (SAIL / JSW / Tata Steel)Power Transmission (Gears)₹160 CrProposal55%outbound
Municipal ZLD water project winMunicipal & Industrial Water BoardsWater & Defence₹140 CrQualify45%signal
Naval / DRDO defence-gear programIndian Navy / DRDOWater & Defence₹110 CrDevelop52%signal