TTriveniExecutive Cockpit

Quote-to-Cash 360

One spine from cane to cash — the value, the conversion, the days, and the leakage at every handoff. Where cane & contracted offtake turn into produced, dispatched, invoiced and collected cash (and where it gets stuck).

Triveni Engineering & Industries Limited · FY24 (Mar'24, audited anchor)
One of India's largest integrated sugar & ethanol producers
5,500 employees · 13+ plants & units · 15 export markets
Executive read· the answer, then the moves

₹168 Cr is leaking or stuck across the 89-day quote-to-cash cycle — the largest single pool is ₹55 Cr at Collect. Close the billing lag and aged book to pull cash forward without selling a thing.

6 of 6 headline metrics improving vs prior · still off target: Total Revenue ₹6,151 Cr vs ₹6,800 Cr, DSO (Days Sales Outstanding) 33d vs 28d, Cash Conversion Cycle 95d vs 80d

Do now — ranked by urgency
  1. 1
    Cane cost inflation on sugar marginAct now
    Why it matters

    Cane development & recovery; maximise ethanol / by-product diversion.

    What's driving it
    • Sugar EBITDA margin
    • Signal: Alert
    FYI

    FRP ₹355/q (+4%) plus SAP pressures sugar EBITDA; recovery must offset.

  2. 2
    ₹80 Cr of programs at risk — Q4 FY26Act now
    Why it matters

    Each lost contract is ethanol & engineering (non-sugar) revenue that won't repeat.

    What's driving it
    • renewal window Q4 FY26
    • Signal: Order-book risk
    FYI
    • Of ₹520 Cr of programs up for renewal in Q4 FY26, ₹80 Cr is at risk of non-repeat.
    • Owner: Chief Marketing & Sales Officer
  3. 3
    ₹90 Cr of programs at risk — Q2 FY27Act now
    Why it matters

    Each lost contract is ethanol & engineering (non-sugar) revenue that won't repeat.

    What's driving it
    • renewal window Q2 FY27
    • Signal: Order-book risk
    FYI
    • Of ₹500 Cr of programs up for renewal in Q2 FY27, ₹90 Cr is at risk of non-repeat.
    • Owner: Chief Marketing & Sales Officer
  4. 4
    Covenant headroom 1× (lev 2.05× vs 3×)Act now
    Why it matters

    Sets capex headroom and refinancing risk on a conservatively levered (~1.9×) balance sheet.

    What's driving it
    • Q1 (act)
    • Signal: Threshold
    FYI
    • Net-debt/EBITDA 2.05× against a 3× lender ceiling.
    • Owner: CFO · Treasury
📈 Offtake, orders & exportsStep 6 of 6 · watch it convert order → cashProject / Job 360Journey complete ✓All journeys
🌐 Enterprise 360 modules· on Order-to-Cash 360Browse all 31 views ▾
● LiveBuilt forCFO· cash conversion & working-capital tied upCOO · Operations· produce → bill lag (unbilled dispatch / export docs)CMO · Sales· quote → order conversion & discount leakage

The cane-to-cash cycle for the group, end to end. Cane becomes contracted offtake, offtake becomes crushed & produced sugar / ethanol, production becomes dispatched goods, dispatch becomes an invoice, and an invoice becomes cash — 89 days from cane to cash, with ₹168 Cr leaking or stuck across the handoffs. Each stage links to the 360 that owns it and the records to work. (Long-term ethanol offtake (OMCs) & gear / water contracts bill on a steadier cadence — this is the make-to-order lane.)

Data backing: o2c_stage (cycle stages) · quote_system · pipeline · project · ar_invoice / ar_aging — composed from the underlying 360s
89d
Quote-to-cash time
quote → collected
₹168 Cr
Tied up in the cycle
leaking or stuck
94%
Collected of booked
rest in inventory / AR
96%
Quote → order
win-to-book
1.05
Book-to-bill
order book growing
The spine

Cane → Crush → Produce → Dispatch → Bill → Collect

Value flowing through each stage, the conversion from the prior stage, days in-stage, and the leakage at the handoff.

Quote20d
₹6,400 Cr
Cane → Contracted Offtake
₹40 Cr leak
Order0d
₹6,151 Cr
Crush & Produce
Deliver30d
₹6,020 Cr
Produce → Dispatch
₹45 Cr leak
Bill6d
₹5,900 Cr
Bill / Invoice
₹28 Cr leak
Collect33d
₹5,780 Cr
Collect / Cash
₹55 Cr leak
Where the time goes

89-day quote-to-cash

The biggest levers are produce/dispatch (crush & production lead time) and collection (DSO) — the order handoff is instant; billing lag is the quiet one.

Quote 20d
Deliver 30d
6d
Collect 33d
Quote · 20dOrder · 0dDeliver · 30dBill · 6dCollect · 33d
Where cash leaks or gets stuck

₹168 Cr across the cycle

Each leak quantified, owned, and linked to the 360 and the records that fix it — the working-capital recovery list.

🌾 Quote₹40 Cr

Off-platform sugar-trade / export pricing vs governed SAP

Owner: Sugar Marketing · Ethanol SalesWork it →
🚚 Deliver₹45 Cr

Sugar-inventory holding + yield / recovery loss on below-target runs

Owner: Operations · CMOWork it →
📄 Bill₹28 Cr

Unbilled dispatch + export-doc lag

Owner: Finance · BillingWork it →▤ records
💵 Collect₹55 Cr

Aged AR >60d — dispatched & billed, not collected

Owner: Treasury · CollectionsWork it →▤ records

Read this: the two biggest pools are ₹55 Cr aged AR (collect) and ₹28 Cr unbilled dispatch / export-doc lag (bill) — both pure working capital. Closing the billing lag and the aged book pulls ~₹83 Cr of cash forward without selling a thing.

Every stage, one row

Stage detail

Value, conversion, days, leakage and owner — drill to the owning 360.

StageValueConv. from priorDays in-stageLeakageOwnerDrill
🌾 Cane → Contracted Offtake₹6,400 Cr20d₹40 CrSugar Marketing · Ethanol Sales
🏭 Crush & Produce₹6,151 Cr96%0dOperations · Mills & Distilleries
🚚 Produce → Dispatch₹6,020 Cr98%30d₹45 CrOperations · CMO
📄 Bill / Invoice₹5,900 Cr98%6d₹28 CrFinance · Billing
💵 Collect / Cash₹5,780 Cr98%33d₹55 CrTreasury · Collections